OpenZhenZhen AI 提示词画廊 · Claude Opus 5.5 · video

Opus与Codex制作视频用量成本对比

Opus vs Codex: Video Production Usage Cost Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5仅用一句提示词、约20%的5小时额度就做出一段视频,作者认为其消耗远低于之前用Codex制作同类视频的额度。

Opus与Codex制作视频用量成本对比 — AI video creation
Opus与Codex制作视频用量成本对比

提示词 / Prompt

中文提示词

原作者未提供提示词,可直接把视频发给 Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 或者以上版本作为参考视频,可直接生成同样风格。

English prompt

原作者未提供提示词,可直接把视频发给 Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 或者以上版本作为参考视频,可直接生成同样风格。

主题与风格

探索更多图片和视频提示词 · 生成图片 · 生成视频 · 在 AI 画布中创作

  • Jelly world Arctic island: Opus vs Astra

    The creator compared Claude Opus 5.5 and ChatGPT-6 Astra on the same detailed prompt to build an interactive Arctic diorama in a single HTML file with native WebGPU, preferring Opus's visuals and colors.

  • OpenAI agent dots animation: Opus vs GPT-6.1

    The creator compared GPT-6.1 Sol Max and Opus 5.5 by making a short animation explaining how OpenAI agents work, from a simple prompt that was not published.

  • Animated website from a single image: Opus vs GPT-6.1

    The creator compared Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol generating animated websites from a single image, using Higgsfield MCP access for the animation, noting Opus took longer but produced more detailed results. 原作需要参考素材;请自行准备图片、视频、音频、文档或代码库等输入。

  • Jelly effect model comparison

    Four AI models (Mistral Large v4, Kimi K3, GPT 6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5) were each asked to recreate the famous jelly effect, with results compared in a video.

  • Opus vs Astra diorama comparison (Blender)

    原作需要参考素材;请自行准备图片、视频、音频、文档或代码库等输入。

  • Pachinko effect: Opus 5.5 version

    原作者未提供提示词,可直接把视频发给 Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 或者以上版本作为参考视频,可直接生成同样风格。