OpenZhenZhen AI 提示词画廊 · Claude Opus 5.5 · video

四款模型视频提示词对比

Comparison of Video Prompts Across Four Models

作者用同一个提示让Claude Opus 5.5、Sonnet 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol和GPT-6 Sol分别生成一个用HTML5 Canvas程序化绘制奔跑红狐的动画,并在回复中公开了完整提示词。

四款模型视频提示词对比 — AI video creation
四款模型视频提示词对比

提示词 / Prompt

English prompt

Create a single, self-contained HTML file using vanilla JavaScript and HTML5 Canvas 2D to procedurally animate a running wild red fox in crisp 1080p (Full HD). No external assets or libraries. Specifications: Canvas & Resolution:Native resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels. Style: Smooth 2D vector-style rendering (anti-aliased Bezier paths, linear/radial gradients, dynamic shading). Fox Rigging & Locomotion:Spine Dynamics: Smooth multi-joint spline showing agile spinal flexion and extension, with a slightly arched back at the gathered phase of the gallop. Leg Kinematics: 4 slender, articulated limbs driven by Inverse Kinematics (IK) for a full rotary gallop, with light, springy foot placement. Secondary Motion: A long, bushy tail streaming behind with inertial, wave-like counterbalancing (spring-damped segments), shoulder-blade sliding, subtle ear flicks, and a stabilized, forward-locked head gaze. Styling: Rich russet-orange coat with layered fur-tuft edges and soft gradient shading. Cream-white chest, muzzle, and belly. Black "stocking" lower legs, black-backed ears, and a white-tipped tail. Amber eyes with a narrow pupil, a pointed snout, and fine whisker strokes. High-Res Parallax Environment: Multi-layer 1080p wild woodland-meadow backdrop:Gradient dawn sky and a distant misty horizon with soft atmospheric haze. Mid-ground with procedural pine and birch tree silhouettes and rolling hills, each layer scrolling at a different speed. Foreground terrain of tall grass, ferns, and fallen leaves, with a high-speed particle system generating kicked-up leaves, dirt, and dust plumes behind the paws. Performance:Optimized for stable 60 FPS execution via requestAnimationFrame. No UI elements

主题与风格

探索更多图片和视频提示词 · 生成图片 · 生成视频 · 在 AI 画布中创作

  • Jelly world Arctic island: Opus vs Astra

    The creator compared Claude Opus 5.5 and ChatGPT-6 Astra on the same detailed prompt to build an interactive Arctic diorama in a single HTML file with native WebGPU, preferring Opus's visuals and colors.

  • OpenAI agent dots animation: Opus vs GPT-6.1

    The creator compared GPT-6.1 Sol Max and Opus 5.5 by making a short animation explaining how OpenAI agents work, from a simple prompt that was not published.

  • Animated website from a single image: Opus vs GPT-6.1

    The creator compared Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol generating animated websites from a single image, using Higgsfield MCP access for the animation, noting Opus took longer but produced more detailed results. 原作需要参考素材;请自行准备图片、视频、音频、文档或代码库等输入。

  • Jelly effect model comparison

    Four AI models (Mistral Large v4, Kimi K3, GPT 6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5) were each asked to recreate the famous jelly effect, with results compared in a video.

  • Opus vs Astra diorama comparison (Blender)

    原作需要参考素材;请自行准备图片、视频、音频、文档或代码库等输入。

  • Pachinko effect: Opus 5.5 version

    原作者未提供提示词,可直接把视频发给 Claude Opus/Sonnet 5.5 或者以上版本作为参考视频,可直接生成同样风格。